SAY NO TO GIANT PYLONS

PLEASE RESPOND TO THE NATIONAL GRID CONSULTATION

foxfield_w_bubbles_1200

National Grid PLC recently announced its final plans to connect the proposed Moorside nuclear power station at Sellafield to the grid at Heysham. They have now been pressured into putting the cables underground through the Lake District National Park. Whilst this was good news for the National Park, it was bad news for the Duddon Estuary, the Whicham Valley and the Furness peninsula. They are now proposing two new lines of pylons running around the Estuary!

We strongly object to these proposals – there are feasible alternatives.

WHAT ARE THE CONCERNS?
  • The 50 metre (160ft) 400kV pylon is the biggest type of pylon used in the UK. These pylons would be higher than St George’s Church in Millom, a sight that can be seen from many places around the estuary. They are about the same height as Nelson’s Column.
  • The Duddon Estuary is considered by Friends of the Lake District to be within the “setting” of the National Park.

A setting is the area whose landscape character complements that of the national park itself, either through similarity or contrast, and in some way supports or enhances its landscape through views into or out of the national park. The setting is also defined by the intervisibility of the landscapes on either side of the park boundary. So whilst the Lake District National Park has a hard boundary, the landscape outside of this boundary is a very important part of what makes the National Park special.

  • Along a stretch of the beautiful Whicham Valley the 50m pylons would be within 10m of the National Park boundary. Together with the 18 wires between the pylons, this would look like a giant steel fence along the edge of the Park.
  • There is an existing line of small pylons along this route, but the 400kV pylon is about twice the height and at least twice as wide. They would break the skyline in many places where the existing pylons do not. National Grid believes that people will not object to replacement pylons that are twice as high and more than twice as wide. They have described the 400kV pylons as “slightly taller”! This is reminiscent of Alice in Wonderland  & Humpty Dumpty:  “a word means just what I choose it to mean”.
    We believe that the existing pylons are an eyesore and should never have been built in this wonderful landscape.
  • They are now proposing two new pylon lines: about 90 giant 50 metre steel pylons and more than 200 Trident 14m wooden poles.
  • View from the A595 into the National Park. Some of the most spectacular landscapes which contribute to the beauty of the Park are across the Duddon Estuary from Kirkby-in-Furness and the A595.  These will be destroyed by National Grid’s giant pylon proposals. The view from the hamlet of Paradise is just one example.  This would be “Paradise Lost”!
  • This project would damage local communities, businesses and tourism. In 2015 there were 43m visitors to Cumbria, who spent £2.4bn. If only a small percentage of this were to be lost, it would justify extra expense on this project.
  • EMFs – High voltage lines bring potential health risks from the effects of electric and magnetic fields (EMFs).  The government’s National Policy Statement for Electricity Networks Infrastructure states: “EMFs can have both direct and indirect effects on human health. The direct effects occur in terms of impacts on the central nervous system resulting in its normal functioning being affected.” Fluorescent tubes under HV lines
  • National Grid PLC is a multi-national private company – it is not a government department. It is completely unacceptable for them to be allowed to ruin our treasured landscapes in this way.
  • Massive disruption to local residents, businesses and visitors during the construction phase
  • ‘Visual Impact Provision’ project – Ofgem has provided £500m to National Grid for the removal of overhead power lines in other areas of natural beauty to reduce the visual impact. This policy should also apply to the Duddon Estuary.
  • National Grid has now agreed to spend much more on putting the connection underground in the National Park. For a small percentage extra, they could solve the whole problem. Our local landscapes are just as valuable. Don’t spoil the ship for a ha’porth of tar!
WHAT ARE THE ALTERNATIVES?
  • Offshore. In 2014 NG put forward a completely offshore sub-sea route from Moorside to Heysham. We still believe this is a feasible option. National Grid’s estimate for this option now appears to have almost doubled. We think the justification for this is in doubt.
  • Kirksanton to Rossall/Fleetwood sub-sea cable. Another (partial) offshore option. This would eliminate the pylon route from Kirksanton to Roosecote. A National Grid study shows this to be feasible.
  • Duddon Tunnel. If they can build a tunnel under Morecambe Bay, they can build one under the Duddon Estuary. A National Grid study shows this to be feasible.
  • Kirksanton to Walney sub-sea cable. Another (partial) offshore option. This would eliminate the pylon route from Kirksanton to Roosecote.
  • Underground through the Whicham Valley, around the Duddon Estuary, and across the Furness peninsula.
  • Several other ways of crossing the Duddon Estuary to avoid the use of pylons.

National Grid feels that the pylon route around the estuary is the most cost-effective solution. However, they are prepared to spend millions on burying cables and constructing tunnels elsewhere. We believe that the Duddon Estuary is just as valuable and deserves the same treatment.

HOW CAN YOU OBJECT?

You can respond to the National Grid PLC consultation which is open for submissions now. It will run from 28th October until 6th January 2017.

Read the documents on the North West Coast Connections (NWCC) website.
There is a non-technical summary which gives an overview of the project itself.
There is an interactive map which shows the route. If you zoom in far enough, you can see the individual pylons.

National Grid are running consultation events from 28th October 2016 – 6th January 2017 for you to discuss anything with their representatives. Please see How to find out more to find the consultation meeting nearest you.

Please note that you don’t have to respond at the consultation event  – you have until 6th January to do it.

FOUR WAYS TO RESPOND:
  • Send an email: nationalgrid@northwestcoastconnections.com. Make sure that you say that your email is a response to the NWCC consultation.
  • Write a letter and send it freepost to FREEPOST NG NWCC. Make sure that you say that it is a response to the NWCC consultation.
  • Fill in a feedback form: you can pick up a copy of the feedback form at a consultation event or an information point. Alternatively you can call NWCC on 0800 876 6990 and they will send you a feedback form in the post. Then all you need to do is provide your details on the front page, respond to as many of the questions as you wish, then post your form back to us at FREEPOST NG NWCC (no stamp required).
  • Respond online by registering on the NWCC website, and filling in your objection there.
WE NEED YOUR HELP

Every voice counts. The more opposition to these plans the more likelihood for success. Everyone in the family can submit a response.

Please help us in our campaign to protect this beautiful area of Cumbria.

For more advice on responding, click here.

You need to respond by 6th January 2017.

Please support Power Without Pylons by emailing info@powerwithoutpylons.org.uk to receive our emails. More news on our News page.

We also have two petitions available through links at the top of this page. Please support both.
Keep up to date on Facebook and Twitter – also available through links at the top.
You can find other ways to get involved on our Action page.

Power Without Pylons is a local group formed to campaign for a pylon-free solution to connecting the proposed Moorside nuclear power station to the UK electricity grid.  The group accepts the need for diverse power generation and welcomes the contribution Moorside will make to the local economy but seeks to protect the unique landscapes of the Lake District. More on our About & Contact page

Read more about the issues involved